Portfolio overview
Understand today’s economics. Rehearse tomorrow’s decisions.
Compare a Solar Sharer scenario
Estimate changes in bills, energy costs, workload and the modelled subsidy gap.
The customer profitability curve
Customer groups ranked by margin per customer
View data
Margin through the period
All costs shown in the selected model scope
View data
One scenario, seven consequences
Solar Sharer uptake
Half-hourly position
Representative day: Mon 1 Mar 2027 · MWh
View data
What this answer depends on
The assumptions that could change the decision
Missing dependencyEQ confirmation of the CSO accounting formula
Smallest useful changeSet total AHT reduction to 3.47% (3.47 percentage points beyond the current control). Pinned CTS then lowers modelled service and acquisition cost by A$483,098.48, bringing contribution to −A$184,584,347.47 against the fixed baseline of −A$184,584,430.39. At 3.46%, contribution is still A$1,309.23 short. This is the minimum AHT-only result at 0.01-point resolution within the 90% bound; fixed staffing and wrap time are unchanged, and cash release requires a staffing decision.
Scenario sensitivityNeither of the two tested joint uptake, shift and price cases reverses the selected case's contribution direction; no reversal threshold was calculated.
- CSO formula is not confirmed by EQ
- modelled customer data is for scenario rehearsal only
- Data pack acceptance check failed